Today we are looking at Standard 8.1 (Student Achievement). This is a Core Requirement, which carries additional gravitas since the consequence of non-compliance is a sanction. You may not realize that current data shows that approximately 45% of schools are found non-compliant with this standard after an off-site review.
SACSCOC released an interpretation of this standard in December 2019 that provides some detail not included in the Resource Manual. The language in the standard is clear that you can select any measures that are appropriate (six is about average), as long as those can be justified within the context of your mission and the student body you serve. The interpretation, which can be found here, adds the following expectations for each institution’s case for compliance with this standard.
- You need to establish a threshold of acceptability and an aspirational goal for student performance for each measure. These must be justified in the narrative and one of them must be the graduation rate measurement you chose when asked by SACSCOC.
- Data must be reported as a whole and in a disaggregated manner. The disaggregation of the data into sub-groups (you guessed it) must be justified in the narrative.
This standard is in the eights (8.1, 8.2.a-c). So, when you fall short of a threshold or goal, your adjustments to improve student performance must be stated and documented. Finally, the student achievement data must be published. All SACSCOC institutions have provided SACSCOC with a link to the student achievement data. Now is a good time to make sure that your link still works and that the data posted are current.
At Southeastern Accreditation Consultants, we’re ready to collaborate and support your accreditation efforts. From reviewing narratives to building your documentation, we offer individualized services to best meet your needs. Contact us to get started.